“It’s very sad,” Tarvin says. “It's not unusual for people to break down in the interview setting with the student attorneys who are representing them. These families have been working so hard trying to figure out how to pay off their debt, and it’s just not working. The cash just doesn’t flow. The money isn’t there, and in most cases, it hasn’t been there for a long time.”
As evidence that people wait too long, Tarvin refers to statistics in The Two Income Trap, a book written by Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren and published in 2003. According to Warren half of all bankrupt families were unwilling to admit, even in an anonymous survey, that they had filed for bankruptcy. She went on to say that as many as 18 million households – compared to the 1.5 million that actually filed in 2003 – would have seen a significant improvement in their balance sheets if they were only willing to sign a bankruptcy petition.
Tarvin attributes this unwillingness to general misconceptions about bankruptcy and one powerful deterrent: shame. This single trait sometimes forces people to go “underground,” meaning they work for cash only, purchase with cash only and then cannot borrow money for any reason or even open a bank account. This usually comes after there has been some kind of legal judgment against them.
“Very often and for whatever reason, there is tremendous shame,” Tarvin says. “For many of our clients, it’s against the tenets of their religion, despite Deuteronomy.”
When counseling clients struggling with these issues, Tarvin will invoke the Biblical passage, part of which states that “at the end of every seven-year period you shall have a relaxation of debts” and “every creditor shall relax his claim on what he has loaned his neighbor.” Because it was rooted in ancient Hebrew and Roman cultural traditions, which valued the recovery of productive capacity of the debtor rather than punishment, despite the creditor’s loss, this passage provides Tarvin with a historical context for explaining the real purpose of bankruptcy.
The real purpose then, according to Tarvin, is not to shame the debtor but rather to simply determine whether he or she can pay. It is a process designed to determine whether the debtor can pay all debts and still have enough money for the basic necessities for living.
“To blame bankruptcy for the debtor’s insolvency and non-payment to the creditor is like blaming the coroner for the death,” Tarvin says. “He – the coroner – is simply pronouncing that the person is deceased. Likewise, a bankruptcy discharge issued by the judge is merely a determination that the debtor is financially unable to pay his debts.”
As Tarvin alluded to above, clients who come into the federal clinic represent a demographic that destroys two other myths that Warren addresses, the myth of the immoral debtor and the over-consumption myth. Warren found that 87 percent of families with children cite only three reasons for bankruptcy: job loss, family breakup and medical problems. Bad investment and credit card overspending are included with “all other reasons” within the remaining 13 percent. Tarvin admits that some clients who come into the federal clinic have reached a financial condition that necessitates bankruptcy because they were irresponsible with credit cards, but these people are a minority.
By far, individuals rather than businesses file the greater number of bankruptcies in federal courts each year. In 2010 there were nearly 1.6 million total filings. Only 3.5 percent of these were business filings.
The Federal Practice Clinic is one of many clinical programs in the School of Law Legal Clinic.
RSS