Study Assesses Impact of Hourly Nursing Rounds on Patient Safety and Satisfaction

Nursing leadership at St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital in Houston investigated whether a standard hourly nursing rounding process implemented though a formal education program would result in improved efficiencies, patient satisfaction and improved quality and safety metrics when compared to a less standardized implementation process. Two 32-bed cardiovascular surgery nursing units (serving as active and control groups) were chosen for the study. Data were collected for six months.

Variables evaluated in the study were:• Efficient delivery of care measured by total number of call lights, steps walked in a shift as documented on pedometers and from a survey of nursing staff citing perceptions of having “enough time” to complete their work• Quality/safety of patient care measured by weekly readmission rates and incidence of patient falls• Patient satisfaction gauged by answers from patients for two questions added to discharge phone questionnaires.

Results showed that daily and weekly call light use differed significantly in the two units, but there was no difference in staff steps logged or perceptions of having enough time to complete work.

For the quality of care measures, there were no differences in the incidence of patient falls or weekly readmission rates between the two nursing units. For patient satisfaction, there was no significant difference in patients’ answers to discharge questions related to satisfaction, although positive feedback was obtained regarding how rapidly call lights were answered.

The authors concluded that because hourly rounding was one of several quality improvement strategies employed, including workshops and in-service education programs, to help improve patient satisfaction, overall improvement in satisfaction was due to the effect of all strategies involved. “While hourly nurse rounding strategies have validity and may be instrumental in improving patient care, more research is needed to clearly define its benefits in achieving effective, efficient and patient centered outcomes,” said lead author Rebecca Kreppler, MBA, RN, professor, College of Nursing, Texas Women’s University, Houston.

About the Journal for Healthcare QualityThe Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ) is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. JHQ is peer reviewed and published six times a year. JHQ publishes scholarly articles targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely, and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation covering topics in: quality improvement, patient safety, performance measurement, best practices in clinical and operational processes, innovation, leadership, information technology, spreading improvement, sustaining improvement, cost reduction, and payment reform.

About NAHQFounded in 1976 and covering a full spectrum of healthcare specialties, the National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHQ) is an essential and interactive resource for quality and patient safety professionals worldwide. NAHQ’s vision is to realize the promise of healthcare improvement through innovative practices in quality and patient safety.

NAHQ’s 12,000-plus members and certificants benefit from cutting edge education and NAHQ’s unique collective body of knowledge, as well as opportunities to learn from a diverse group of professionals. These resources help assure success for implementing improvements in quality outcomes and patient safety, navigating the changing healthcare landscape, and serving as the voice of quality. Visit www.nahq.org to learn more.###