Florin Dolcos is a professor of psychology at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and a full-time faculty member at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology.

He performed his Ph.D. research in cognitive and affective neurosciences at the University of Alberta’s Centre for Neuroscience and Duke University’s Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, and his postdoctoral training in cognitive, affective, and clinical neurosciences at Duke University’s Brain Imaging and Analysis Center. Dolcos joined the University of Illinois following an assistant professor appointment in the University of Alberta’s Department of Psychiatry.

Research

Dolcos researches the neural correlates of affective-cognitive interactions in healthy and clinical populations, as studied with brain imaging techniques such as functional MRI and ERP. His program can be divided into the following main directions:

  1. Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Impact of Emotion on Cognition.
    This direction investigates the mechanisms underlying the enhancing and impairing effects of emotion on various cognitive/executive processes (perception, attention, working memory, episodic memory, decision making). A novel direction emerging from this research investigates the neural mechanisms linking and dissociating the opposing effects of emotion. This is important because they tend to co-occur in both healthy functioning and clinical conditions. For instance, enhanced distraction produced by task-irrelevant emotional information can also lead to better memory for the distracters themselves. Also, enhanced memory for traumatic events in PTSD can also lead to impaired cognition due to increased emotional distractibility.

    2. Neural Mechanisms Underlying the Impact of Cognition on Emotion.
    The impact of cognition on emotion is typically exerted as cognitive control of emotion, or emotion regulation. This direction is corollary to my first direction, and is important to pursue, because optimal cognitive control of emotional responses is a key component of healthy emotional behavior, whereas maladaptive regulation strategies constitute a core feature of affective disorders. Thus, in our studies we also manipulate emotion regulation strategies (e.g., suppression, reappraisal, attentional deployment), to investigate the regulatory mechanisms mediating the beneficial or detrimental impact of emotion on cognition.

    3. Neural Mechanisms of Emotion-Cognition Interactions in Social Contexts.
    My research also targets mechanisms of emotion-cognition interactions in social contexts. This newly emerging direction in my research program is also important, because proper processing and interpretation of emotional social cues are key components of successful social behavior. Therefore, we are also investigating the neural mechanisms of processing emotional information as social cues, and of their impact on behavior.

    4. The Role of Individual Differences in Emotion-Cognition Interactions.
    Although the first three lines of research have clear clinical relevance, it is important to also directly investigate the very same issues in clinical cohorts. Therefore, my research program also includes collaborations with clinical researchers that investigate neural mechanisms of emotion-cognition interactions in patients with mood and anxiety disorders (depression, PTSD), as well as investigation of changes associated with therapeutic interventions. Investigation of individual differences, however, is important not only for understanding clinical conditions, but also for integrative understanding of the factors that influence individual variation in the vulnerability to, or resilience against, emotional and cognitive challenges leading to disturbances. Thus, in my research, I have also investigated the role of gender, age, personality, and genetic differences in emotion-cognition interactions. Especially relevant are emerging large-scale studies using comprehensive behavior-personality-brain approaches emphasizing integrative understanding that is critical for the development of training and preventive programs aimed to increase resilience and reduce vulnerability to emotional disturbances.

Title

Cited By

Year

Don’t look back: the aftermath of a distressing event is more memorable than the lead-up, study suggests

A Beckman study led by Paul Bogdan and Florin and Sanda Dolcos suggests the moments that follow a distressing episode are more memorable than the moments leading up to it.
18-Jan-2024 02:05:50 PM EST

“For example, a war veteran hearing a loud noise and inferring that their building will soon collapse due to an explosion,” Florin Dolcos said. “This happens because there is a rupture between the memory of the traumatic experience and its original context: the what breaks from the where and the when.”

- Don’t look back: the aftermath of a distressing event is more memorable than the lead-up, study suggests

“You may have groups of selfish people who are more accepting of other selfish people, and in order to be part of that group, newcomers might display the same behavior,” he said.

- Study: People expect others to mirror their own selfishness, generosity

“The goal of the game is to maximize one’s own profits, so accepting any offer would be the logical way to proceed,” Florin Dolcos said. “But people don’t generally behave that way. If they feel an offer is unfair, they’re more likely to reject it, to punish unfair partners even though this comes at their own expense.”

- Study: Brain mechanisms involved in learning also drive social conformity

“I hope this is an example of where religion and science can work together to maintain and increase well-being,” Florin Dolcos said.

- Study: Religion, psychology share methods for reducing distress

Available for logged-in users onlyLogin HereorRegister

No Video

close
0.07668