“The ACR’s primary objective was to provide recommendations on optimal treatment for patients with AS and non-radiographic axial SpA that were based on quality evidence and took into consideration patient values and preferences,” said Michael Ward, MD, MPH, an investigator for the National Institutes of Health who served as principal investigator for the guideline project. “While the guideline does not cover all aspects of spondyloarthritis management, it provides a foundation based on the current best-available evidence.”
In addition to covering a broad spectrum of treatment options, the guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (called GRADE) approach – a system recognized for transparency and for rating both the quality of available evidence and the strength of recommendations made. Important features of this method include the specification of patient groups, interventions, competing treatment alternatives and outcomes; grading the quality of the evidence used; and basing recommendation strength on evidence quality, balance of benefits and harms, patient preference of treatment options, as well as clinical experience and expertise.
Each recommendation is designated as being strongly for, conditionally for, conditionally against, or strongly against. Recommendations that were strongly for a given treatment signified that almost all patients would choose to receive the intervention and clinicians could expect it to be accepted by most patients to whom it is offered. Recommendations that were conditionally for a specified treatment signified that most patients would likely choose the intervention, but a sizable majority may not, and education and shared decision-making should play a large role. On the opposite end, conditional recommendations in opposition to an intervention signified that only a small a minority of patients would choose it, and education and shared decision-making would be important. Finally, strong recommendations in opposition to a treatment option signified interventions that most patients should neither receive nor be offered.
The recommendations are divided into five categories:
• Recommendations for the treatment of patients with active AS (pharmacologic and rehabilitation)• Recommendations for the treatment of patients with stable AS (pharmacologic and rehabilitation)• Recommendations for the treatment of patients with either active or stable AS• Recommendations for the treatment of patients with AS and specific impairments or comorbidities (such as advanced hip arthritis, severe kyphosis, acute iritis, and inflammatory bowel disease)• Education and preventive care recommendations; and• Recommendations for the treatment of patients with non-radiographic axial SpA.
Each category contains several recommendations pertaining to pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions, followed by supporting evidence and rationale.
The recommendations can be viewed in their entirety HERE. For more information, or to request an interview with an expert, contact Jocelyn Givens at [email protected] or 404-633-3777 ext. 810.
Editor’s note: Publications were created to provide guidance and are not intended to be used for diagnostic purposes. Patients should talk with their rheumatologists to determine the best course of treatment in their particular clinical situations.
Headquartered in Atlanta, Ga., the American College of Rheumatology is an international medical society representing over 9,400 rheumatologists and rheumatology health professionals with a mission to Advance Rheumatology! In doing so, the ACR offers education, research, advocacy and practice management support to help its members continue their innovative work and provide quality patient care. Rheumatologists are experts in the diagnosis, management and treatment of more than 100 different types of arthritis and rheumatic diseases. For more information, visit www.rheumatology.org.
RSS