But judging by the track records of other ancient apocalyptic traditions, we probably have nothing to worry about, says Allen Kerkeslager, Ph.D., associate professor of theology at Saint Joseph’s University in Philadelphia. Kerkeslager has taught courses dealing with the apocalyptic traditions of other ancient cultures including Persian Zoroastrians and early Jewish groups.
Those drawn to concepts of the apocalypse for religious and cultural reasons have often pointed to various events in history as signs of a coming Armageddon, Kerkeslager says.
“People who want to emphasize an apocalyptic end often look at natural disasters as signs of the end,” he says. “They’ll say these earthquakes, famines, floods and wars are signs, but the problem with that is that there have always been earthquakes, famines, floods and wars.”
The desecration of the Jewish temple in 168 B.C. is one such historical event. This led to apocalyptic prophecies in the Hebrew Bible’s Book of Daniel, which predicted a coming apocalypse in the following 1,290 days, Kerkeslager says. However, as we know, it was an apocalypse that never happened.
According to Kerkeslager, prophecies of a coming annihilation, like Daniel’s, have been wrong regardless of the religion or culture from which they originate for the simple fact that there has yet to be a great watery or fiery end, despite thousands of years' worth of prophecies.
And what about concerns of a possible 2012 doomsday? “If anything does happen, it’ll be pure coincidence,” says Kerkeslager.
Apocalyptic prophecies are not completely without merit, however. Though they’ve proven to be inaccurate and unreliable, they at least provide the framework for entertaining, blockbuster Hollywood disaster movies like "2012," as Kerkeslager notes.
RSS