The team found that by blocking an immune system protein in the skin with an antibody, they could halt the processes that tell the brain the skin is itchy. The research was done in mice and is described in the Nov. 7 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. They hope their model could lead to potential treatments for people who are allergic to poison ivy -- an estimated 80 percent of the population.
For most people, contact with poisonous plants is painful but not life-threatening. Still, there are significant health care costs associated with more than 10 million people in the U.S. affected each year, said senior author Sven-Eric Jordt, Ph.D., associate professor of anesthesiology at Duke.
“Poison ivy rash is the most common allergic reaction in the U.S., and studies have shown that higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are creating a proliferation of poison ivy throughout the U.S. -- even in places where it wasn’t growing before,” Jordt said. “When you consider doctor visits, the costs of the drugs that are prescribed and the lost time at work or at school, the societal costs are quite large.”
Some symptoms of the fiery, blistering rash can be alleviated with antihistamines and steroids. But in recent years, scientists have determined that the most severe itching doesn’t go away with antihistamines, because it arises from a different source, Jordt said.
Jordt and collaborators determined the itch is triggered by interleukin 33 (IL-33), a protein in the skin involved in immune response.
All people have IL-33 in their skin, but the protein is elevated in people who have eczema and psoriasis, Jordt said. The protein is known for inducing inflammation, but these new experiments show the protein also acts directly on the nerve fibers in the skin, exciting them and telling the brain that the skin is severely itchy.
The researchers used an antibody to block IL-33 and found that it not only reduced inflammation, but also cut down scratching in mice with poison ivy rashes. An antibody that counteracts human IL-33 is currently being evaluated in humans through a Phase 1 clinical trial to determine its safety and potential side effects.
In an additional approach tested in the mouse experiments, the researchers also found they could also alleviate itch by blocking a receptor for IL-33, called ST2.
“There could be translational significance here,” Jordt said. “So our next step will be to look at human skin to see if we see the same activity and the same pathways. We will also look at anti-inflammatory drugs that are already approved to see if they have the potential to alleviate itch.”
In addition to Jordt, study authors include Boyi Liu; Yan Tai; Satyanarayana Achanta; Melanie M. Kaelberer; Ana I. Caceres; Xiaomei Shao; and Jianqiao Fang.
The research was supported by the Duke Anesthesiology DREAM Innovation Grant (2015-DIG LIU), Zhejiang Chinese Medical University Start-Up Funding (722223A08301/ 001/004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81603676) and three National Institutes of Health -- the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1 TR001117), the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01 ES015056, U01 ES015674) and the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Disease (R21 AR070554). The authors declare no conflicts of interest.###
Journal Link: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
MEDIA CONTACT
Register for reporter access to contact detailsCITATIONS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; 2015-DIG LIU, 722223A08301/ 001/004, 81603676, UL1 TR001117, R01 ES015056, U01 ES015674, R21 AR070554